Re: Windows CE .net
From: Headache (rquirk_at_tandbergtv.com)
Date: 10/21/04
- Next message: Mihajlo Cvetanovic: "Re: Newbie Question"
- Previous message: Balboos: "VC++.NET2003/MFC target Win98 ?"
- In reply to: Will Singer: "Re: Windows CE .net"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 21 Oct 2004 08:18:47 -0700
"Will Singer" <will@pdmb.com> wrote in message news:<#uiEVvqtEHA.160@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl>...
> Thanks... as ususual, just missed the obvious. Also needed the olece300.dll.
> Are all .net machines coming without these already installed? I was really
> pleased when CE 2.0 came out and automatically included these and a few
> other standard dlls on the machine. I hope we are not going back to the
> 'find the right version' game.
>
> Thanks for the help,
>
> Will Singer
>
> "Headache" <rquirk@tandbergtv.com> wrote in message
> news:ae149124.0410200418.31498fef@posting.google.com...
> > "Will Singer" <will@pdmb.com> wrote in message
> news:<OSwjoletEHA.220@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl>...
> > > I have a new MobilePro 900c (Windows CE .net) and when I try to run my
> > > existing application it says it is missing part of the application. I
> look
> > > for the
> > > mfc dll and it is not there. I try copying the mfcce30.dll from the ARM
> > > folder inWindows CE Tools and it still doesn't work. Any ideas or am I
> > > missing something really obvious.
> > >
> > > Any thoughts or suggestions would be welcome.
> > >
> > > TIA,
> > >
> > > Will Singer
> >
> > Are you building your application and uploading it as a Windows CE
> > kernel or is the application developed by somebody else and you hoped
> > to just move the DLL to a directory? If the latter, how do you know
> > that it is *just* the mfcce30.dll the application is whining about?
Well it all depends on the product! Windows CE can be used as a
general O/S on a palm-top or it can have a reduced kernel to run a
particular application. I have programmed the latter. When I did this
it was for a dedicated handheld device (of which there are many
examples .. let's pick one .. language translator). One program runs
taking in one language and translating it to another) not much demand
for a GUI, large database (dictionary). For such a device retailing at
say 30 dollars you want the cheapest chips possible. This means low
memory requirements. With such low memory a programmer would use
Windows CE PlatformBuilder to create a minimal kernel. The small O/S
kernel and application might run in 64MB of flash with 512MB
disk-on-chip for the dictionary itself. When Windows CE runs as a
generally full O/s on a Palm top you will most likely have the correct
DLLs for a wide variety of applications. In that regard - yes I am
astonished you're moving DLLs around!
- Next message: Mihajlo Cvetanovic: "Re: Newbie Question"
- Previous message: Balboos: "VC++.NET2003/MFC target Win98 ?"
- In reply to: Will Singer: "Re: Windows CE .net"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
