Re: MSDN extern C document is wrong?
- From: George <George@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 9 Oct 2008 00:49:00 -0700
Hi Stuart,
I have to admit that the second example in the MSDN article
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/0603949d%28VS.80%29.aspx seems
a bit misleading since it uses the 'extern "C"' construct in a strange
fashion. Normally, you only use this keyword inside headers that can
be used to compile both C and C++ code:
Which point do you think is misleading? :-)
Actually from grammar point of view, I could understand, but not sure which
are the best and practical usage?
regards,
George
.
- References:
- MSDN extern C document is wrong?
- From: George
- Re: MSDN extern C document is wrong?
- From: Ulrich Eckhardt
- Re: MSDN extern C document is wrong?
- From: George
- Re: MSDN extern C document is wrong?
- From: dertopper
- Re: MSDN extern C document is wrong?
- From: George
- Re: MSDN extern C document is wrong?
- From: dertopper
- Re: MSDN extern C document is wrong?
- From: George
- Re: MSDN extern C document is wrong?
- From: dertopper
- MSDN extern C document is wrong?
- Prev by Date: Re: different result on x86 and x64
- Next by Date: Re: What is the latest Microsoft Visual C++ reference library book to order?
- Previous by thread: Re: MSDN extern C document is wrong?
- Next by thread: Re: MSDN extern C document is wrong?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|