Re: calling convention stdcalll and cdecl call
- From: "Alf P. Steinbach" <alfps@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 21:30:30 +0200
* Igor Tandetnik:
Alf P. Steinbach <alfps@xxxxxxxx> wrote:* Igor Tandetnik:printf is a counterexample of what? It uses cdecl convention, whereI think you're stupid.
the caller is responsible for clearing up the stack. Consider also:
printf("%d", 1, 2);
How would your hypothetical stdcall printf know to remove 12 bytes
worth of parameters, rather than 8?
That's what kids on the playground say when they don't have any arguments. Have a nice day.
Or perhaps you're just weaseling, who knows.
For what it's worth the above example (1) has undefined behavior, (2) states that I somehow have ownership of an addressing convention, which is incorrect and misleading and just idiotic, but typical weaseling rhetoric, and (3) asks a question you already got complete demonstration code for, and based on that example you yourself pointed out one possible answer to that question.
It shouldn't be that hard to admit a technical mistake.
But instead you start (1) misrepresenting me, (2) accusing me of "complaining" etc, and now (3) accusing me of lacking arguments when I refuse to address all your inane babble, as if such accusations could correct your mistake.
But I think you're simply stupid.
- Alf
--
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is it such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: calling convention stdcalll and cdecl call
- From: Liviu
- Re: calling convention stdcalll and cdecl call
- From: Igor Tandetnik
- Re: calling convention stdcalll and cdecl call
- From: Alex Blekhman
- Re: calling convention stdcalll and cdecl call
- References:
- Re: calling convention stdcalll and cdecl call
- From: Igor Tandetnik
- Re: calling convention stdcalll and cdecl call
- From: Alf P. Steinbach
- Re: calling convention stdcalll and cdecl call
- From: Igor Tandetnik
- Re: calling convention stdcalll and cdecl call
- From: Alf P. Steinbach
- Re: calling convention stdcalll and cdecl call
- From: Igor Tandetnik
- Re: calling convention stdcalll and cdecl call
- From: Alf P. Steinbach
- Re: calling convention stdcalll and cdecl call
- From: Igor Tandetnik
- Re: calling convention stdcalll and cdecl call
- Prev by Date: Re: calling convention stdcalll and cdecl call
- Next by Date: api to create new thread
- Previous by thread: Re: calling convention stdcalll and cdecl call
- Next by thread: Re: calling convention stdcalll and cdecl call
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|