Re: global and static object
- From: Vincent Fatica <vince@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 10 Apr 2008 09:48:12 -0400
On Thu, 10 Apr 2008 09:08:42 +0200, "SvenC" <SvenC@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
No Windows API functions depend on CRT.
All Windows API functions are depend on CRT?
Don't you see that you write the opposite of Igors sentence? Is it a
typo or don't you read answers carefully?
I repeat: Igor told you that no Windows API depends on the CRT
Maybe just a misinterpretation here. Consider
No Windows API functions depend on CRT.
--
- Vince
.
- References:
- Re: global and static object
- From: George
- Re: global and static object
- From: David Wilkinson
- Re: global and static object
- From: George
- Re: global and static object
- From: David Wilkinson
- Re: global and static object
- From: George
- Re: global and static object
- From: Igor Tandetnik
- Re: global and static object
- From: George
- Re: global and static object
- From: Igor Tandetnik
- Re: global and static object
- From: George
- Re: global and static object
- From: SvenC
- Re: global and static object
- Prev by Date: Standard C Library and utf-8
- Next by Date: Re: ambiguous access of 'Base' ??
- Previous by thread: Re: global and static object
- Next by thread: Re: global and static object
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|