Re: partial specialization
- From: "Jack Hanebach" <firstname@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2008 08:11:51 -0700
Igor Tandetnik wrote:
The reason is the same as for function
templates: member functions can be overloaded, and then there's no
way to uniquely specify which overload you are specializing: just a
function name is insufficient.
I'm not sure I know what you mean. I can see a problem with templated
methods - with non-template ones I cannot see a problem unique to
partial specialization. Maybe I'm missing something, can you sho an
example?
Besides, there's nothing wrong with compile error when ambiguity
arizes... :)
--
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: partial specialization
- From: Igor Tandetnik
- Re: partial specialization
- References:
- partial specialization
- From: Jack Hanebach
- Re: partial specialization
- From: Igor Tandetnik
- Re: partial specialization
- From: Jack Hanebach
- Re: partial specialization
- From: Igor Tandetnik
- partial specialization
- Prev by Date: Re: CComVariant
- Next by Date: Re: CComVariant
- Previous by thread: Re: partial specialization
- Next by thread: Re: partial specialization
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|