Re: call base class function or derived class function
- From: "Ben Voigt [C++ MVP]" <rbv@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 09:09:56 -0500
George wrote:
Hi Ben,
The compiler cannot avoid generating the abstract class v-table in
all cases. Consider:
I do not think your above statement is correct. Here is my code and
Why do you disagree with my statement? The inverse would be "no abstract
class v-table is never needed", which you now have to argue in favor of.
.
- References:
- Re: call base class function or derived class function
- From: Igor Tandetnik
- Re: call base class function or derived class function
- From: George
- Re: call base class function or derived class function
- From: Abhishek Padmanabh
- Re: call base class function or derived class function
- From: George
- Re: call base class function or derived class function
- From: Abhishek Padmanabh
- Re: call base class function or derived class function
- From: Ben Voigt [C++ MVP]
- Re: call base class function or derived class function
- From: Igor Tandetnik
- Re: call base class function or derived class function
- From: Ben Voigt [C++ MVP]
- Re: call base class function or derived class function
- From: Igor Tandetnik
- Re: call base class function or derived class function
- From: Igor Tandetnik
- Re: call base class function or derived class function
- From: Abhishek Padmanabh
- Re: call base class function or derived class function
- From: Ben Voigt [C++ MVP]
- Re: call base class function or derived class function
- From: George
- Re: call base class function or derived class function
- Prev by Date: Re: call base class function or derived class function
- Next by Date: Re: QueryPerformanceFrequency
- Previous by thread: Re: call base class function or derived class function
- Next by thread: Re: call base class function or derived class function
- Index(es):