Re: Here, the debugger says: Waited == .00500 seconds.
- From: "Scott Seligman" <seligman@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 26 Sep 2007 07:10:56 -0700
<Jeff_Relf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
while ( Secs < Start + .005 );
Nice, a solution that's
- Just as un-maintainable and illegible as all the solutions you post
- Pegs the core it's running on for no good reason
- Is increasingly inaccurate the longer a system has been up
--
--------- Scott Seligman <scott at <firstname> and michelle dot net> ---------
I think; therefore I am.
-- Rene Descartes
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Tom can do what ever he wants during those 5 milliseconds.
- From: Jeff☠Relf
- Tom can do what ever he wants during those 5 milliseconds.
- References:
- Here, the debugger says: “ Waited == .00500 ” seconds.
- From: Jeff☠Relf
- Here, the debugger says: “ Waited == .00500 ” seconds.
- Prev by Date: Re: Manifest problem
- Next by Date: Re: Only one end of a stack is dynamic, the oldest item is the last removed.
- Previous by thread: Re: Here, the debugger says: “ Waited == .00500 ” seconds.
- Next by thread: Tom can do what ever he wants during those 5 milliseconds.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
