Re: VC8 template base class member function visibility bug
- From: Max Weinberg <gitarrenschlumpf@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2007 12:07:52 -0700
Thanks for looking at this. To be honest, I don't understand the
snippet from the standard even after reading it multiple times. I got
access to two more compilers: GCC 4.1 doesn't compile it as well:
"template class used without template parameters". But the Intel 10.0
compiler compiles it without complaining, and executes the line in
question as if it was "BaseTemplate<unsigned>::test(123);".
So maybe the VC8 is right in compiling this, but the compilation
result is definitely wrong, since it modifies unrelated data.
Greetings, Max
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: VC8 template base class member function visibility bug
- From: Vladimir Nesterovsky
- Re: VC8 template base class member function visibility bug
- References:
- VC8 template base class member function visibility bug
- From: MaxW
- Re: VC8 template base class member function visibility bug
- From: Vladimir Nesterovsky
- VC8 template base class member function visibility bug
- Prev by Date: Re: volatile parameters
- Next by Date: Re: volatile parameters
- Previous by thread: Re: VC8 template base class member function visibility bug
- Next by thread: Re: VC8 template base class member function visibility bug
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|