Re: shared_ptr
- From: LarryW <lwdaddio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 15:33:52 PST
In article <Q8idnWgiP9smVDLYnZ2dnUVZ_vWtnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, P.J. Plauger
wrote:
As of the Berlin meeting last April, the C++ committee votedI didn't get it from the Boost library because I didn't want the hassle of
to incorporate most of TR1 (including shared_ptr) into the next revision
of Standard C++. You can get all that stuff now by licensing our upgrade
library for VC++ and layering it atop the shipped library.
We're still trying to convince Microsoft to license our TR1 code sooner
rather than later, instead of waiting several years for it to become a
formal part of the new C++ Standard. Microsoft is very much driven by
perceived customer demands. If you want it, let 'em know.
trying to get it layered on all of our developers installs. I want something
like that to be a built in thing. How would you suggest is the best way to
"let 'em know"? Thanks!
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: shared_ptr
- From: Cholo Lennon
- Re: shared_ptr
- From: P.J. Plauger
- Re: shared_ptr
- References:
- shared_ptr
- From: LarryW
- Re: shared_ptr
- From: P.J. Plauger
- shared_ptr
- Prev by Date: Re: shared_ptr
- Next by Date: Re: shared_ptr
- Previous by thread: Re: shared_ptr
- Next by thread: Re: shared_ptr
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
