Re: Visual C++ vs Visual C#
- From: pa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Pierre Asselin)
- Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2006 16:36:32 +0000 (UTC)
Victor Bazarov <v.Abazarov@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Ganesh wrote:
According to my 10 years exp in C++, my advice is start C -> C++ ->
VC++. If you want to do some real development and most optimized, it's
always recommended to go for C++.
Totally disagree on the beginning of the sequence. DO NOT start with C.
A huge waste of time.
I know that's what people likeStroustrup recommend, but... I
watched one guy try to learn C++ directly and that was a mistake.
I think he would have done better by learning C first.
Any experience counter to mine ? It might be off-topic in this ng
but I would be interested.
--
pa at panix dot com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Visual C++ vs Visual C#
- From: Bo Persson
- Re: Visual C++ vs Visual C#
- References:
- Re: Visual C++ vs Visual C#
- From: Ganesh
- Re: Visual C++ vs Visual C#
- From: Victor Bazarov
- Re: Visual C++ vs Visual C#
- Prev by Date: Re: C1001 -- VC6 with SP6
- Next by Date: Re: Coverting a Registry Time Stamp to a Unix Time Code
- Previous by thread: Re: Visual C++ vs Visual C#
- Next by thread: Re: Visual C++ vs Visual C#
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
