Re: Position of MS regarding the future C++ Standard
- From: "Victor Bazarov" <v.Abazarov@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 10:55:18 -0400
John Browning wrote:
For all the years C++ exists there is still no commonly accepted
frameworks for mundane tasks.
That's true to a point but in any event, while C++ is a beautful
language in many ways (more than C# which is still immature IMO),
it's also a failure due to its complexity and "tendency" to blow up
in the hands of the inexperienced. That wouldn't be a problem if the
programming masses were mostly masters at their craft. Given that
most programmers *are* "inexperienced" however (to put it
euphemestically), then it's better to give them a safety ".NET" to
work with.
Nobody complains about the existence of .NET and C#. They have their
place and purpose. FWIW, they do compete with native code, but that
is inevitable. Everything competes within the same environment, as
does everything cooperate. The resources are limited, and the fittest
(for any particular situation) system wins inevitably if all are after
the same resource.
That's not what this discussion was about, IIUIC.
V
--
Please remove capital 'A's when replying by e-mail
I do not respond to top-posted replies, please don't ask
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Position of MS regarding the future C++ Standard
- From: John Browning
- Re: Position of MS regarding the future C++ Standard
- References:
- Position of MS regarding the future C++ Standard
- From: Gianluca Silvestri
- Re: Position of MS regarding the future C++ Standard
- From: Victor Bazarov
- Re: Position of MS regarding the future C++ Standard
- From: Michael Chambers
- Re: Position of MS regarding the future C++ Standard
- From: Victor Bazarov
- Re: Position of MS regarding the future C++ Standard
- From: Michael Chambers
- Re: Position of MS regarding the future C++ Standard
- From: William DePalo [MVP VC++]
- Re: Position of MS regarding the future C++ Standard
- From: John Browning
- Re: Position of MS regarding the future C++ Standard
- From: William DePalo [MVP VC++]
- Re: Position of MS regarding the future C++ Standard
- From: Nemanja Trifunovic
- Re: Position of MS regarding the future C++ Standard
- From: William DePalo [MVP VC++]
- Re: Position of MS regarding the future C++ Standard
- From: Victor Bazarov
- Re: Position of MS regarding the future C++ Standard
- From: William DePalo [MVP VC++]
- Re: Position of MS regarding the future C++ Standard
- From: Victor Bazarov
- Re: Position of MS regarding the future C++ Standard
- From: Alex Blekhman
- Re: Position of MS regarding the future C++ Standard
- From: Victor Bazarov
- Re: Position of MS regarding the future C++ Standard
- From: Alex Blekhman
- Re: Position of MS regarding the future C++ Standard
- From: Victor Bazarov
- Re: Position of MS regarding the future C++ Standard
- From: Alex Blekhman
- Re: Position of MS regarding the future C++ Standard
- From: Victor Bazarov
- Re: Position of MS regarding the future C++ Standard
- From: Alex Blekhman
- Re: Position of MS regarding the future C++ Standard
- From: John Browning
- Position of MS regarding the future C++ Standard
- Prev by Date: String ^ type and global variables
- Next by Date: Re: ASP.net 2.0 Session Problem pls help its urgent!!!!!!!!
- Previous by thread: Re: Position of MS regarding the future C++ Standard
- Next by thread: Re: Position of MS regarding the future C++ Standard
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|