Re: Visual Studio 6 vs. .NET 2005
- From: "Bruno van Dooren" <bruno_nos_pam_van_dooren@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2006 20:00:49 +0100
Were I you, I'd google for the Express Edition of VS 2005, I think it is a
free download. If you find that some modern code doesn't compile you may
be able to use express. If you find yourself in that situation often,
maybe it would pay you to upgrade.
for anything to do with STL and templates you have to use VC2003 or 2005 if
you want your code to be standards compliant. VC6 is very bad in that
regard, as william already indicated.
you can download the express edition for free from microsoft:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/vstudio/express/visualC/default.aspx
Just btw, in addition to better standard compliance the new version has
support for targetting the .Net framework.
you also need to download the latest platform SDK for windows native
programming.
one disadvantage is that you don't get MFC and ATL with the free version.
--
Kind regards,
Bruno.
bruno_nos_pam_van_dooren@xxxxxxxxxxx
Remove only "_nos_pam"
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Visual Studio 6 vs. .NET 2005
- From: David Wilkinson
- Re: Visual Studio 6 vs. .NET 2005
- From: William DePalo [MVP VC++]
- Re: Visual Studio 6 vs. .NET 2005
- References:
- Visual Studio 6 vs. .NET 2005
- From: Thomas
- Re: Visual Studio 6 vs. .NET 2005
- From: William DePalo [MVP VC++]
- Visual Studio 6 vs. .NET 2005
- Prev by Date: Re: Visual Studio 6 vs. .NET 2005
- Next by Date: Re: Visual Studio 6 vs. .NET 2005
- Previous by thread: Re: Visual Studio 6 vs. .NET 2005
- Next by thread: Re: Visual Studio 6 vs. .NET 2005
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading