Re: Windows Function definitions
- From: "mr.sir bossman" <mrsirbossman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2005 22:24:09 -0700
> Utterly stupid IMO =\ why deprive yourself of a great set of support code.
Where can I download MFC again? Isn't it legacy now?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Windows Function definitions
- From: Lawrence Groves
- Re: Windows Function definitions
- References:
- Windows Function definitions
- From: mr.sir bossman
- Re: Windows Function definitions
- From: Frank Hickman [MVP]
- Re: Windows Function definitions
- From: mr.sir bossman
- Re: Windows Function definitions
- From: Igor Tandetnik
- Re: Windows Function definitions
- From: mr.sir bossman
- Re: Windows Function definitions
- From: Frank Hickman [MVP]
- Re: Windows Function definitions
- From: mr.sir bossman
- Re: Windows Function definitions
- From: Mark Randall
- Windows Function definitions
- Prev by Date: Re: XML phaser in C
- Next by Date: Re: Binary Operations
- Previous by thread: Re: Windows Function definitions
- Next by thread: Re: Windows Function definitions
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|