Re: LPOLESTR to std::string conversion
- From: "Arnaud Debaene" <adebaene@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 19:25:33 +0200
Florent wrote:
> Arnaud : These conversion macros need the inclusion of <atlX.h>
> header(s), which raise more than a hundred compilation errors in these
> atlX.h [sub]headers, like C2039, C2059, C2061, C2146, C2501, C3861,
Could you post a small sample that reproduce the behaviour? I'll bet on some
macro incompatibilities that could be worked around.
Arnaud
MVP - VC
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: LPOLESTR to std::string conversion
- From: Florent
- Re: LPOLESTR to std::string conversion
- References:
- LPOLESTR to std::string conversion
- From: Florent
- Re: LPOLESTR to std::string conversion
- From: Arnaud Debaene
- Re: LPOLESTR to std::string conversion
- From: Florent
- Re: LPOLESTR to std::string conversion
- From: Arnaud Debaene
- Re: LPOLESTR to std::string conversion
- From: Florent
- LPOLESTR to std::string conversion
- Prev by Date: Re: LPOLESTR to std::string conversion
- Next by Date: RE: c++ comp. argument passing and prefix operator
- Previous by thread: Re: LPOLESTR to std::string conversion
- Next by thread: Re: LPOLESTR to std::string conversion
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|