Re: Moving from C++ to VC++
- From: "Bo Persson" <bop@xxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 17:52:25 +0200
"Doug Harrison [MVP]" <dsh@xxxxxxxx> skrev i meddelandet
news:1kr4nh0k58tg9$.198jrc1ms8etl.dlg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 12:51:23 +0200, Hendrik Schober wrote:
>
>> > [...] Not to mention, your "no
>> > excuse" comment about 64 bit longs suggests you might use it
>> non-portably
>> > if it were available to you. I mean, if you're such a portable
>> guy, why
>> > would you even care about this?
>>
>> Because now I have to use '__int64'?
>
> At least your code would then capture your requirement for the type.
No it definitely does not!
It only documents that we need a rather long integer. What happens when
we move on to the next generation?
Right, *some* of these will have to be changed into __int128. Which
ones? Nobody knows!
Bo Persson
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Moving from C++ to VC++
- From: Doug Harrison [MVP]
- Re: Moving from C++ to VC++
- References:
- Moving from C++ to VC++
- From: NoName
- Re: Moving from C++ to VC++
- From: Severian [MVP]
- Re: Moving from C++ to VC++
- From: Victor Bazarov
- Re: Moving from C++ to VC++
- From: Carl Daniel [VC++ MVP]
- Re: Moving from C++ to VC++
- From: Hendrik Schober
- Re: Moving from C++ to VC++
- From: Carl Daniel [VC++ MVP]
- Re: Moving from C++ to VC++
- From: Hendrik Schober
- Re: Moving from C++ to VC++
- From: Doug Harrison [MVP]
- Re: Moving from C++ to VC++
- From: Hendrik Schober
- Re: Moving from C++ to VC++
- From: Doug Harrison [MVP]
- Re: Moving from C++ to VC++
- From: Hendrik Schober
- Re: Moving from C++ to VC++
- From: Doug Harrison [MVP]
- Moving from C++ to VC++
- Prev by Date: Re: Moving from C++ to VC++
- Next by Date: Re: Moving from C++ to VC++
- Previous by thread: Re: Moving from C++ to VC++
- Next by thread: Re: Moving from C++ to VC++
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|