Re: Managed C++

From: "William DePalo [MVP VC++]" <willd.no.spam@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 09:35:25 -0400

"Eugene Gershnik" <gershnik@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:us7Vw6KTFHA.2548@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> What MS probably wanted to say is that .NET is *more* language independent
> than JVM. This is certanly true but the J-word and any mention of
> J-technology is a big no-no in a .NET world.

Any mention? If that were so there would not be the J# language.

Regards,
Will

.

References:
- Managed C++
  - From: David Webber
- Re: Managed C++
  - From: Nemanja Trifunovic
- Re: Managed C++
  - From: David Webber
- Re: Managed C++
  - From: William DePalo [MVP VC++]
- Re: Managed C++
  - From: David Webber
- Re: Managed C++
  - From: Carl Daniel [VC++ MVP]
- Re: Managed C++
  - From: Eugene Gershnik
- Re: Managed C++
  - From: David Webber
- Re: Managed C++
  - From: Eugene Gershnik

Prev by Date: RE: Java outperforms C++?
Next by Date: Re: Java outperforms C++?
Previous by thread: Re: Managed C++
Next by thread: Re: Managed C++
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread