Re: Java outperforms C++?
- From: "Mark Randall" <markyr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 21:44:49 +0100
I will never believe anyone saying Java is quicker than C or C++ because
from the simple ASM I think I know... if you need more than 1 instruction to
do something that only takes 1 instruction... its going to be slower.
--
- Mark Randall
http://zetech.swehli.com
"benben" <benhongh@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:%23QMc2f1PFHA.2468@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>I have taken C++'s speed for granted for years, so I was stunned by the
> table of Cost of Common Operations between C++ and Java on page 601 of
> Code
> Complete 2nd Edition by Steve McConnell. It seems, as shown in the table,
> that Java outperforms C++ in every criteria, if not merely matches the
> latter.
>
> Is that I am reading the table the wrong way? or my previous assumption
> has
> been so wrong? or the author had the columns reversed?
>
> ben
>
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Java outperforms C++?
- From: Simon Trew
- Re: Java outperforms C++?
- References:
- Java outperforms C++?
- From: benben
- Java outperforms C++?
- Prev by Date: Re: Porting Binary Files
- Next by Date: Re: _variant_t constructor bug?
- Previous by thread: Re: Java outperforms C++?
- Next by thread: Re: Java outperforms C++?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|