Re: Why avoid constants as macros?
From: Mike Gleason Jr Couturier (mikejrMAPSON_at_videotron.ca)
Date: 12/15/04
- Next message: Relvinian: "Re: length of a string?"
- Previous message: Roman Yankin: "Is it possible to use info from *.PDB for debugging?"
- In reply to: wh0cares: "Re: Why avoid constants as macros?"
- Next in thread: Murrgon: "Re: Why avoid constants as macros?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2004 09:55:08 -0500
>
> If you can get your paws on a copy of "The C++ Programming Language" by
> Bjarne Stroustoup he describes why you should not use macros in more
detail.
>
See also the free http://mindview.net/Books/TICPP/ThinkingInCPP2e.html
"Thinking in C++ 2nd Edition by Bruce Eckel" which explain well in
Volume 1 the concept of consts versus macros
Mike
- Next message: Relvinian: "Re: length of a string?"
- Previous message: Roman Yankin: "Is it possible to use info from *.PDB for debugging?"
- In reply to: wh0cares: "Re: Why avoid constants as macros?"
- Next in thread: Murrgon: "Re: Why avoid constants as macros?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|