Re: How good an encryption algorithm is this?
From: Tim Roberts (timr_at_probo.com)
Date: 11/24/04
- Next message: Tim Roberts: "Re: Is there a bigger data type than double or long double (64bit)?"
- Previous message: Carl Daniel [VC++ MVP]: "Re: VC 2003 namespace bug"
- In reply to: Bonj: "Re: How good an encryption algorithm is this?"
- Next in thread: Bonj: "Re: How good an encryption algorithm is this?"
- Reply: Bonj: "Re: How good an encryption algorithm is this?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 22:42:00 -0800
"Bonj" <benjtaylor at hotpop d0t com> wrote:
>
>Surely XOR requires binary, which was only invented in the1940s or
>something?
>Why would people before the age of computers understand binary?
Are you serious??? Number bases are a part of mathematics. They have been
used for thousands of years. The Mayans are supposed to have used base 60.
Any society with an inclination towards mathematics probably played with
base 2.
George Boole (for which "Boolean" is named) wrote a book called "The Laws
Of Thought" in 1854. This book introduced what we now know as "Boolean
logic", including rigorous definitions of NEGATION, AND, OR, and XOR.
No, despite the arrogance of most of us in the industry, and contrary to
what the patent office would lead you to believe, the essential truth is
that NOTHING about computers is new.
-- - Tim Roberts, timr@probo.com Providenza & Boekelheide, Inc
- Next message: Tim Roberts: "Re: Is there a bigger data type than double or long double (64bit)?"
- Previous message: Carl Daniel [VC++ MVP]: "Re: VC 2003 namespace bug"
- In reply to: Bonj: "Re: How good an encryption algorithm is this?"
- Next in thread: Bonj: "Re: How good an encryption algorithm is this?"
- Reply: Bonj: "Re: How good an encryption algorithm is this?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|