Re: Can objects have properties?
From: Sigurd Stenersen (sigurds_at_utvikling.com)
Date: 09/27/04
- Next message: Igor Tandetnik: "Re: Strange behaviour of linker (vc++)"
- Previous message: Sigurd Stenersen: "Re: Strange behaviour of linker (vc++)"
- In reply to: Arnie Mauer: "Re: Can objects have properties?"
- Next in thread: Arnie Mauer: "Re: Can objects have properties?"
- Reply: Arnie Mauer: "Re: Can objects have properties?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 20:51:13 +0200
Arnie Mauer wrote:
> I'm starting a port from Borland C++ Builder to VC++. Properties are
> heavily used in C++ Builder and have been for many years. We have
> over 200 executables to port. Therefore, I'd like to keep our object
> API as close to intact as possible. For this I need properties.
It seems you're not very worried about runtime overhead, so maybe COM is an
option unless you have a lot of classes in each executable.
(What the hexx do you use 200+ executables for ?)
-- Sigurd http://utvikling.com
- Next message: Igor Tandetnik: "Re: Strange behaviour of linker (vc++)"
- Previous message: Sigurd Stenersen: "Re: Strange behaviour of linker (vc++)"
- In reply to: Arnie Mauer: "Re: Can objects have properties?"
- Next in thread: Arnie Mauer: "Re: Can objects have properties?"
- Reply: Arnie Mauer: "Re: Can objects have properties?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|