Re: Visual Studio Question
From: David Lowndes (davidl_at_example.invalid)
Date: 04/18/04
- Next message: Carl Daniel [VC++ MVP]: "Re: Visual Studio Question"
- Previous message: Barry Schwarz: "Re: Compiler options leading to Warning C4013?"
- In reply to: daniel kaplan: "Visual Studio Question"
- Next in thread: Carl Daniel [VC++ MVP]: "Re: Visual Studio Question"
- Reply: Carl Daniel [VC++ MVP]: "Re: Visual Studio Question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2004 23:49:06 +0100
>it took me 2 years to finally upgrade from VC 5 to 6. the reason being was
>when i tried i had to do some much adjusting to the workspace to make it
>compile....
>
>now am considering upgrading to the latest, which is NET right?
VS2003 is the latest released version.
>anyone know of any grief in doing the same?
The latest C++ compiler is much more standard conforming than previous
versions, though if your code is compiled with VC5/6 you probably
won't be too concerned with that aspect.
The VS IDE is quite considerably different from VC6, so if you found
the relatively small changes from VC5 to 6 problematic, you'll
certainly find difficulties moving to VS.
Dave
-- MVP VC++ FAQ: http://www.mvps.org/vcfaq
- Next message: Carl Daniel [VC++ MVP]: "Re: Visual Studio Question"
- Previous message: Barry Schwarz: "Re: Compiler options leading to Warning C4013?"
- In reply to: daniel kaplan: "Visual Studio Question"
- Next in thread: Carl Daniel [VC++ MVP]: "Re: Visual Studio Question"
- Reply: Carl Daniel [VC++ MVP]: "Re: Visual Studio Question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|