Re: why need virtual constructor
From: Simon Trew (noneofyour_at_business.guv)
Date: 04/13/04
- Next message: Roy Fine: "Re: SQL Server for standalone computer"
- Previous message: Simon Trew: "Re: Searching Algorithm"
- In reply to: John Carson: "Re: why need virtual constructor"
- Next in thread: John Carson: "Re: why need virtual constructor"
- Reply: John Carson: "Re: why need virtual constructor"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 12:38:51 +0100
... one detail you missed, C95 and CXP would both be derived from a common
base class, and outside the factory everyone would deal in terms of that
common base class (let's call it an interface).
S.
- Next message: Roy Fine: "Re: SQL Server for standalone computer"
- Previous message: Simon Trew: "Re: Searching Algorithm"
- In reply to: John Carson: "Re: why need virtual constructor"
- Next in thread: John Carson: "Re: why need virtual constructor"
- Reply: John Carson: "Re: why need virtual constructor"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|