Re: Compiler error or? Microsoft VC++ v6.0
From: Torstein Hansen (torsteinRemoveThis_at_hansen.as)
Date: 02/17/04
- Next message: Morten Aune Lyrstad: "Re: Is this really the fastest I can get my alpha blending routine??"
- Previous message: Torstein Hansen: "Re: Compiler error or? Microsoft VC++ v6.0"
- In reply to: Ron Natalie: "Re: Compiler error or? Microsoft VC++ v6.0"
- Next in thread: Hendrik Schober: "Re: Compiler error or? Microsoft VC++ v6.0"
- Reply: Hendrik Schober: "Re: Compiler error or? Microsoft VC++ v6.0"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 21:19:22 GMT
"Ron Natalie" <ron@sensor.com> wrote in message
news:403282f0$0$139$9a6e19ea@news.newshosting.com...
>
> "Torstein Hansen" <torsteinRemoveThis@hansen.as> wrote in message
news:kpvYb.464$72.135468032@news.telia.no...
>
> > But in this code it's not the literal 0, rather
> > const unsigned long u0 = 0
> >
> That's good enough. The rule says that a null pointer constant is a
integer
> constant expression evaluating to zero. A const variable initialized
with a
> constant qualifies as a constant expression.
>
Right - I'll just have to accept the rule. Even though it made for some
long deep looks into the code to figure out what happened...
Thanks all...
Torstein
- Next message: Morten Aune Lyrstad: "Re: Is this really the fastest I can get my alpha blending routine??"
- Previous message: Torstein Hansen: "Re: Compiler error or? Microsoft VC++ v6.0"
- In reply to: Ron Natalie: "Re: Compiler error or? Microsoft VC++ v6.0"
- Next in thread: Hendrik Schober: "Re: Compiler error or? Microsoft VC++ v6.0"
- Reply: Hendrik Schober: "Re: Compiler error or? Microsoft VC++ v6.0"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|