Re: DirectShow with VS2005

Tech Tip: Click here to run a free scan for Windows Errors and optimize PC performance

Thanks. Looks like just what I needed. I'll give it a try in the morning.

"Tom Serface" <tserface@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:O3NBhY9QGHA.5908@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
This thread may help you out:

http://forums.microsoft.com/MSDN/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=178296&SiteID=1

Tom

"Burt" <burt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4i3Qf.37454$i72.1467@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Not sure if this is the right group for this question. If not, please
direct me to the right one. I've got 11 VC groups I have started
monitoring, but have little clear idea of the distinction between
several...

We have a large commercial application that has been developed in Visual
Studio 2003 for the past couple years. I have been asked to port it all
to VS 2005 in preparation for moving to Vista. I have the core
application ported already (took hundreds of line of code changes), and
am now working on the myriad DLLs that are also part of the product.

One set of DLLs uses DirectShow extensively. We have installed the
February SDK, and extracted the needed Platform SDK and Baseclasses
stuff.

1) First, there are about 10 'deprecated method' warnings in the headers.
Since I really, really want to have everything compile without warnings,
this is a nuisance. It is also a worry, since it makes me think maybe it
hasn't been properly updated to VS2005.

2) When I get to the link stage, I get some undefined methods (varies
with the DLL).

3) In trying to resolve this, I went back to basics and decided to try
and get the sample code to work. In reading the release notes in detail,
I saw the following:


6.6.2 The following non-WinFX samples do not compile in this version
of the Windows SDK

The samples listed below do not compile in this version of the SDK.
Additionally, none of the DirectShow samples compile. There is no
workaround for this issue.

<<<<<<<<<<<<

OK. Now I am worrying...

Is DirectShow completely dead in VS2005? Is there a way I can get this
to work, or am I wasting my time?






.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: DirectShow with VS2005
    ... One set of DLLs uses DirectShow extensively. ... February SDK, and extracted the needed Platform SDK and Baseclasses stuff. ... The samples listed below do not compile in this version of the SDK. ... none of the DirectShow samples compile. ...
    (microsoft.public.vc.ide_general)
  • DirectShow with VS2005
    ... One set of DLLs uses DirectShow extensively. ... SDK, and extracted the needed Platform SDK and Baseclasses stuff. ... The samples listed below do not compile in this version of the SDK. ... none of the DirectShow samples compile. ...
    (microsoft.public.vc.ide_general)
  • Re: Why do we use different files for C ?
    ... webcam in the SDK as I recall. ... means to use a webcam in my own apps. ... Due to the __extremly__ low quality of the SDK documentation, ... DirectShow really has amazing low latencies. ...
    (alt.lang.asm)
  • Re: Create ASF File Using XVID Codecs
    ... I started out using DirectShow and I have a lot of respect for the ... Format 9.5 SDK. ... The Format SDK is not an easy beast to master (at least I did not think ... >> XviD can be stored in ASF for DivX playback by the Windows Media ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsmedia.sdk)
  • Re: directShow samples dont build and/or regsvr32
    ... install is a brand new machine w/ VS2005 installed. ... If compiling with the solutions you *will* need the SDK include and the ... Iain Downs (DirectShow MVP) ...
    (microsoft.public.win32.programmer.directx.video)