Re: Visual C++ .NET
From: David (not_at_here.com)
Date: 03/05/04
- Previous message: Aleksandar Vukelja: "Re: Visual C++ 6 Problem"
- In reply to: Ed Dore [MSFT]: "Re: Visual C++ .NET"
- Next in thread: Ed Dore [MSFT]: "Re: Visual C++ .NET"
- Reply: Ed Dore [MSFT]: "Re: Visual C++ .NET"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 11:06:44 +0000 (UTC)
Thanks for the reply. I'd looked at the 'choosing' page and wondered what
was implied by the lack of an 'advanced optimising compiler'. As a rule
we're building in-process COM components althought there are also some
standard C++ DLLs in there too - are you saying the .lib file format differs
between Standard and Pro editions?
David
"Ed Dore [MSFT]" <eddo@online.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:OXT1c.480529$na.1161172@attbi_s04...
> Hi David,
>
> This info can be found at
> http://msdn.microsoft.com/vstudio/howtobuy/choosing.aspX. There's a link
on
> the right of this page that details the features that are available in the
> Pro .vs Standard editions.
>
> The only reason I can think of offhand that would "require" you to upgrade
> would be if you were building libraries or building MFC7 extension DLL's.
> This would pretty much necessitate you using the same version of VC .Net
> across your project.
>
> Sincerely,
> Ed Dore [MSFT]
>
> This post is "AS IS" with no warranties and confers no rights.
>
>
- Previous message: Aleksandar Vukelja: "Re: Visual C++ 6 Problem"
- In reply to: Ed Dore [MSFT]: "Re: Visual C++ .NET"
- Next in thread: Ed Dore [MSFT]: "Re: Visual C++ .NET"
- Reply: Ed Dore [MSFT]: "Re: Visual C++ .NET"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|