Re: Supporting ATL
From: Igor Tandetnik (itandetnik_at_mvps.org)
Date: 03/03/05
- Previous message: Howard Swope: "Re: MIDL Question (vanishing enums)"
- In reply to: Fredrik Wahlgren: "Re: Supporting ATL"
- Next in thread: Fredrik Wahlgren: "Re: Supporting ATL"
- Reply: Fredrik Wahlgren: "Re: Supporting ATL"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 16:01:31 -0500
"Fredrik Wahlgren" <fredrik.p.wahlgren@mailbox.swipnet.se> wrote in
message news:ewHy7zCIFHA.2852@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl
> Even if you link dynamically, you shouldn't need to distribute atl.dll
"Linking dynamically" means linking against atl.dll, by definition. Do
you expect the DLL to just magically appear on the system? It is not
shipped with, say, Win98 or WinNT out of the box. Probably not with
Win2K either, but I'm not sure.
--
With best wishes,
Igor Tandetnik
With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is not
necessarily a good idea. It is hard to be sure where they are going to
land, and it could be dangerous sitting under them as they fly
overhead. -- RFC 1925
- Previous message: Howard Swope: "Re: MIDL Question (vanishing enums)"
- In reply to: Fredrik Wahlgren: "Re: Supporting ATL"
- Next in thread: Fredrik Wahlgren: "Re: Supporting ATL"
- Reply: Fredrik Wahlgren: "Re: Supporting ATL"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|