Re: Supporting ATL
From: Fredrik Wahlgren (fredrik.p.wahlgren_at_mailbox.swipnet.se)
Date: 03/03/05
- Next message: Fredrik Wahlgren: "Re: basic_string to BSTR conversion"
- Previous message: siapash: "Re: Delivering events from a worker thread using attributed ATL"
- In reply to: Igor Tandetnik: "Re: Supporting ATL"
- Next in thread: Igor Tandetnik: "Re: Supporting ATL"
- Reply: Igor Tandetnik: "Re: Supporting ATL"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 21:06:05 +0100
"Igor Tandetnik" <itandetnik@mvps.org> wrote in message
news:Oj%23n0s1HFHA.3500@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
> "asid" <asid369@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:uBkrKW0HFHA.2924@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl
> > When using ATL in an app, is it necessary to distribute any DLL/module
> > supporting ATL with the app? If so then which one that should be?
>
> As an option, you can link to ATL dynamically, then you need to
> redistribute atl.dll, atl7.dll or atl71.dll (for VC6, V7 and VC7.1
> correspondingly). Or, you can choose to link to ATL statically, in which
> case it does not bring in any additional dependencies.
> --
> With best wishes,
> Igor Tandetnik
>
> With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is not
> necessarily a good idea. It is hard to be sure where they are going to
> land, and it could be dangerous sitting under them as they fly
> overhead. -- RFC 1925
>
>
>
Even if you link dynamically, you shouldn't need to distribute atl.dll
/Fredrik
- Next message: Fredrik Wahlgren: "Re: basic_string to BSTR conversion"
- Previous message: siapash: "Re: Delivering events from a worker thread using attributed ATL"
- In reply to: Igor Tandetnik: "Re: Supporting ATL"
- Next in thread: Igor Tandetnik: "Re: Supporting ATL"
- Reply: Igor Tandetnik: "Re: Supporting ATL"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|