Re: FOF_NO_UI Constant
- From: "MikeD" <nobody@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 21:54:17 -0400
"GeoffG" <geoffcg@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:%23nTdGrKhIHA.1184@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Karl:
Very many thanks.
The prospect of downloading up to 1000+ Mb on a flakey broadband
connection didn't fill me with joy, especially as I'm really only wanting
an updated version of the WIN32API.TXT file. So, I'm grateful to you.
Does the following line:
#define FOF_NO_UI (FOF_SILENT | FOF_NOCONFIRMATION |
FOF_NOERRORUI | FOF_NOCONFIRMMKDIR) // don't display any UI at all
mean that the value of FOF_NO_UI is 0x0614? That is, the sum of:
FOF_SILENT (0x0004) + FOF_NOCONFIRMATION (0x0010) + FOF_NOERRORUI (0x0400)
+ FOF_NOCONFIRMMKDIR (0x0200)
Not exactly. Those are bitmasks, so you OR them rather than ADD them.
--
Mike
Microsoft MVP Visual Basic
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: FOF_NO_UI Constant
- From: PeterD
- Re: FOF_NO_UI Constant
- From: GeoffG
- Re: FOF_NO_UI Constant
- References:
- FOF_NO_UI Constant
- From: GeoffG
- Re: FOF_NO_UI Constant
- From: Karl E. Peterson
- Re: FOF_NO_UI Constant
- From: GeoffG
- FOF_NO_UI Constant
- Prev by Date: Re: FOF_NO_UI Constant
- Next by Date: Re: FOF_NO_UI Constant
- Previous by thread: Re: FOF_NO_UI Constant
- Next by thread: Re: FOF_NO_UI Constant
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading