Re: API equivillent of RegSvr32.exe ?
- From: "Mark Alexander Bertenshaw" <mark.bertenshaw@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 14:01:03 +0100
"J French" <erewhon@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4360ead0.285345817@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 13:14:43 +0100, "Mark Alexander Bertenshaw"
> <mark.bertenshaw@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> >This is essentially the same as what Tony suggested. It still doesn't
> >return a value.
>
> It does to me ... looks like ERROR_SUCCESS
Yes, and guess what ERROR_SUCCESS is equal to: zero! The error message
which you must trap means that VB couldn't resolve the stack correctly after
returning from the function. I wouldn't rely on any apparent return value
from the function if you were using this hack.
--
Mark
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: API equivillent of RegSvr32.exe ?
- From: J French
- Re: API equivillent of RegSvr32.exe ?
- References:
- Re: API equivillent of RegSvr32.exe ?
- From: Mark Alexander Bertenshaw
- Re: API equivillent of RegSvr32.exe ?
- From: SimonM
- Re: API equivillent of RegSvr32.exe ?
- From: J French
- Re: API equivillent of RegSvr32.exe ?
- From: Mark Alexander Bertenshaw
- Re: API equivillent of RegSvr32.exe ?
- From: J French
- Re: API equivillent of RegSvr32.exe ?
- Prev by Date: Re: Can a form return a user defined type?
- Next by Date: Re: Type library with only Win32 declarations needs registration for EXE to run.
- Previous by thread: Re: API equivillent of RegSvr32.exe ?
- Next by thread: Re: API equivillent of RegSvr32.exe ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|