Re: copymemory basic question
- From: "Jim Mack" <jmack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 20:25:06 -0400
Karl E. Peterson wrote:
> Jim Mack wrote:
>> Karl E. Peterson wrote:
>>>>> I might have an idea on speeding that up a bit...
>>>>
>>>> Just for completeness, there's a DxSwapStr function in Stamina --
>>>> worth seeing how it stacks [cough] up against any VB versions.
>>>
>>> <ahem>
>>>
>>> Well... Yeah, that one pretty well blows away the immediate
>>> competition. Three runs, VB5/SP3, EXE /w all opts:
>>
>> I took a look at the source, and I see that I'm being overly paranoid
>> about what might get passed in. I could cut the code by 1/3 if I
>> could guarantee no null pointers, and I think there may be a way to
>> do that. Probably get down to 75 on your scale.
>>
>> But I'll only do that if you find a way to top it. :-)
>
> I think you got your work cut out for you. Latest results:
>
Ouch! But check your email... :-)
--
Jim
.
- References:
- Re: copymemory basic question
- From: Karl E. Peterson
- Re: copymemory basic question
- From: Donald Lessau
- Re: copymemory basic question
- From: Jim Mack
- Re: copymemory basic question
- From: Donald Lessau
- Re: copymemory basic question
- From: Karl E. Peterson
- Re: copymemory basic question
- From: Jim Mack
- Re: copymemory basic question
- From: Karl E. Peterson
- Re: copymemory basic question
- From: Jim Mack
- Re: copymemory basic question
- From: Karl E. Peterson
- Re: copymemory basic question
- Prev by Date: Re: copymemory basic question
- Next by Date: Re: ZORDER using API
- Previous by thread: Re: copymemory basic question
- Next by thread: Re: copymemory basic question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|