Re: copymemory basic question
- From: "Jim Mack" <jmack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 18:40:29 -0400
Karl E. Peterson wrote:
> Hi Jim --
>
>>> I might have an idea on speeding that up a bit...
>>
>> Just for completeness, there's a DxSwapStr function in Stamina --
>> worth seeing how it stacks [cough] up against any VB versions.
>
> <ahem>
>
> Well... Yeah, that one pretty well blows away the immediate
> competition. Three runs, VB5/SP3, EXE /w all opts:
>
I took a look at the source, and I see that I'm being overly paranoid about what might get passed in. I could cut the code by 1/3 if I could guarantee no null pointers, and I think there may be a way to do that. Probably get down to 75 on your scale.
But I'll only do that if you find a way to top it. :-)
--
Jim
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: copymemory basic question
- From: Karl E. Peterson
- Re: copymemory basic question
- References:
- Re: copymemory basic question
- From: Karl E. Peterson
- Re: copymemory basic question
- From: Donald Lessau
- Re: copymemory basic question
- From: Jim Mack
- Re: copymemory basic question
- From: Donald Lessau
- Re: copymemory basic question
- From: Karl E. Peterson
- Re: copymemory basic question
- From: Jim Mack
- Re: copymemory basic question
- From: Karl E. Peterson
- Re: copymemory basic question
- Prev by Date: Re: copymemory basic question
- Next by Date: Re: copymemory basic question
- Previous by thread: Re: copymemory basic question
- Next by thread: Re: copymemory basic question
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading