Re: copymemory basic question

"Someone" <nobody@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:oc0Re.6919$ct5.2257@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> However, I don't think that it's a good idea to rely on whether the
> optimizer can do it or not,

Yes. The point I want to make is that it is often difficult for us to
predict what is most efficient and what is a performance problem. It is
entirely possible to decrease performance by trying to increase it.

> it's best to test it with a timing routine to see which method is faster.

It is typical of experts to say something like that.


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: About Machine Performance issue
    ... waitio is a meaningless metric. ... Please describe the performance problem. ... Tell us what load the system ... Prev by Date: ...
    (comp.unix.solaris)
  • Re: please verify the code
    ... Joe Wright wrote: ... Its a rule of thumb -- and it seems I got it wrong. ... which of course it not a performance problem. ... Prev by Date: ...
    (comp.lang.c)
  • Re: How to delete STATSPACK data efficient to release back space?
    ... Are you really running into any performance problem? ... higher intervel like say 1 ro 2 hours. ... WantedToBeDBA. ... Prev by Date: ...
    (comp.databases.oracle.server)
  • Re: FastMove bad RTL Replacement for Athlon XP
    ... Main interest is to locate the performance problem. ... This time I am interested to see how effective patching is also. ... Best regards ... Prev by Date: ...
    (borland.public.delphi.language.basm)