Re: gettickcount returns a negative number???
- From: "Karl E. Peterson" <karl@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 15:38:31 -0700
Sam Hobbs wrote:
> "Karl E. Peterson" <karl@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:%23b%2337VmqFHA.3216@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> As J implied, that value *varies* by system.
>
> Whatever J said or implied, the documentation says that it varies.
> What is the point of saying it does? If you think I said anything
> inconsistent with what you said here, then you misunderstood what I
> said.
So you see no significant difference between:
>> 119.3182 (counts per second).
and
> 2,392,210,000
Convenient how you ignore that, troll...
--
Working Without a .NET?
http://classicvb.org/petition
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: gettickcount returns a negative number???
- From: Sam Hobbs
- Re: gettickcount returns a negative number???
- References:
- gettickcount returns a negative number???
- From: pithhelmet
- Re: gettickcount returns a negative number???
- From: Sam Hobbs
- Re: gettickcount returns a negative number???
- From: Karl E. Peterson
- Re: gettickcount returns a negative number???
- From: Sam Hobbs
- Re: gettickcount returns a negative number???
- From: Karl E. Peterson
- Re: gettickcount returns a negative number???
- From: Sam Hobbs
- Re: gettickcount returns a negative number???
- From: J French
- Re: gettickcount returns a negative number???
- From: Sam Hobbs
- Re: gettickcount returns a negative number???
- From: J French
- Re: gettickcount returns a negative number???
- From: Karl E. Peterson
- Re: gettickcount returns a negative number???
- From: Sam Hobbs
- gettickcount returns a negative number???
- Prev by Date: Re: copymemory basic question
- Next by Date: Re: Connecting to the Internet
- Previous by thread: Re: gettickcount returns a negative number???
- Next by thread: Re: gettickcount returns a negative number???
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|