Re: gettickcount returns a negative number???
- From: "Karl E. Peterson" <karl@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 10:39:57 -0700
Sam Hobbs wrote:
> "J French" <erewhon@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote ...
>>
>> It really is not suitable for solving OP's problem
>> - it introduces a whole new load of problems
>
> Yes, it does provide more precision than is needed here, but no one
> can be specific about any other potential problem.
>
> For my system, QueryPerformanceFrequency returns a frequency of
> 119.3182 (counts per second).
As J implied, that value *varies* by system. On this box (itself rapidly approaching
2.5 years old!), QPF returns:
2,392,210,000
Move along, troll...
--
Working Without a .NET?
http://classicvb.org/petition
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: gettickcount returns a negative number???
- From: Sam Hobbs
- Re: gettickcount returns a negative number???
- From: Donald Lessau
- Re: gettickcount returns a negative number???
- From: Sam Hobbs
- Re: gettickcount returns a negative number???
- References:
- gettickcount returns a negative number???
- From: pithhelmet
- Re: gettickcount returns a negative number???
- From: Sam Hobbs
- Re: gettickcount returns a negative number???
- From: Karl E. Peterson
- Re: gettickcount returns a negative number???
- From: Sam Hobbs
- Re: gettickcount returns a negative number???
- From: Karl E. Peterson
- Re: gettickcount returns a negative number???
- From: Sam Hobbs
- Re: gettickcount returns a negative number???
- From: J French
- Re: gettickcount returns a negative number???
- From: Sam Hobbs
- Re: gettickcount returns a negative number???
- From: J French
- gettickcount returns a negative number???
- Prev by Date: Re: Seeking info on wParam and lParam
- Next by Date: Re: gettickcount returns a negative number???
- Previous by thread: Re: gettickcount returns a negative number???
- Next by thread: Re: gettickcount returns a negative number???
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading