Re: gettickcount returns a negative number???
- From: "Sam Hobbs" <samuel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 10:57:05 -0700
"J French" <erewhon@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:430dca8e.20117134@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> On Wed, 24 Aug 2005 20:44:40 -0700, "Sam Hobbs"
> <samuel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>"Karl E. Peterson" <karl@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>news:%23bWPHIRqFHA.3720@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>>> Have you not considered that before recommending it?
>
>>I assume then that you don't have an answer to the question of why
>>QueryPerformanceCounter is inappropriate.
>
> Well, simplistically, GetTickCount is the time you have been alive
>
> QueryPerformanceCounter is your rate of heart beat
>
> Apples and Oranges
QueryPerformanceFrequency is the heart beat, correct?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: gettickcount returns a negative number???
- From: J French
- Re: gettickcount returns a negative number???
- References:
- gettickcount returns a negative number???
- From: pithhelmet
- Re: gettickcount returns a negative number???
- From: Sam Hobbs
- Re: gettickcount returns a negative number???
- From: Karl E. Peterson
- Re: gettickcount returns a negative number???
- From: Sam Hobbs
- Re: gettickcount returns a negative number???
- From: Karl E. Peterson
- Re: gettickcount returns a negative number???
- From: Sam Hobbs
- Re: gettickcount returns a negative number???
- From: J French
- gettickcount returns a negative number???
- Prev by Date: Re: What is the fastest way to determine if folder has subfolders or not!?
- Next by Date: Re: Seeking info on wParam and lParam
- Previous by thread: Re: gettickcount returns a negative number???
- Next by thread: Re: gettickcount returns a negative number???
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading