Re: gettickcount returns a negative number???

From: "Sam Hobbs" <samuel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 20:44:40 -0700

"Karl E. Peterson" <karl@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:%23bWPHIRqFHA.3720@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Have you not considered that before recommending it?

I assume then that you don't have an answer to the question of why
QueryPerformanceCounter is inappropriate.

.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gettickcount returns a negative number???
  - From: Karl E. Peterson
- Re: gettickcount returns a negative number???
  - From: J French

References:
- gettickcount returns a negative number???
  - From: pithhelmet
- Re: gettickcount returns a negative number???
  - From: Sam Hobbs
- Re: gettickcount returns a negative number???
  - From: Karl E. Peterson
- Re: gettickcount returns a negative number???
  - From: Sam Hobbs
- Re: gettickcount returns a negative number???
  - From: Karl E. Peterson

Prev by Date: Re: Seeking info on wParam and lParam
Next by Date: Re: copymemory basic question
Previous by thread: Re: gettickcount returns a negative number???
Next by thread: Re: gettickcount returns a negative number???
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: gettickcount returns a negative number???
... >> Have you not considered that before recommending it? ... >QueryPerformanceCounter is inappropriate. ... QueryPerformanceCounter is your rate of heart beat ... Prev by Date: ...
(microsoft.public.vb.winapi)
Re: gettickcount returns a negative number???
... >> Have you not considered that before recommending it? ... > QueryPerformanceCounter is inappropriate. ... Prev by Date: ...
(microsoft.public.vb.winapi)
Re: gettickcount returns a negative number???
... >>> Have you not considered that before recommending it? ... >>QueryPerformanceCounter is inappropriate. ... QueryPerformanceFrequency is the heart beat, ... Prev by Date: ...
(microsoft.public.vb.winapi)