Re: Window focus
- From: "Karl E. Peterson" <karl@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 13:33:44 -0700
Thorsten Albers wrote:
> Karl E. Peterson <karl@xxxxxxxx> schrieb im Beitrag
> <uCXaAZRbFHA.796@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>...
>> Sam was being an a-hole... Clearly, to everyone *except* him, the
>> OP (you) meant "active" or "inactive" state, but used the colloquial
>> "focus" instead. His purpose is to confuse.
>
> Even if I don't like most of his postings I can't see any reason for
> beeing such impolite. And also I can't see anything in his postings
> which points to such a purpose.
Maybe I've been paying closer attention, since first spotting the trend?
--
Working Without a .NET?
http://classicvb.org/petition
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Window focus
- From: Thorsten Albers
- Re: Window focus
- References:
- Window focus
- From: Lindsay
- Re: Window focus
- From: Sam Hobbs
- Re: Window focus
- From: Randy Birch
- Re: Window focus
- From: Sam Hobbs
- Re: Window focus
- From: Lindsay
- Re: Window focus
- From: Karl E. Peterson
- Re: Window focus
- From: Thorsten Albers
- Window focus
- Prev by Date: Re: Window focus
- Next by Date: Re: Window focus
- Previous by thread: Re: Window focus
- Next by thread: Re: Window focus
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading