Re: Window focus
- From: "Karl E. Peterson" <karl@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 10:11:16 -0700
Lindsay wrote:
> Now that made sense. Quite unlike the previous post, of which I have
> to agree with Randys ?????s, did not.
Sam was being an a-hole... Clearly, to everyone *except* him, the OP (you) meant
"active" or "inactive" state, but used the colloquial "focus" instead. His purpose
is to confuse.
--
Working Without a .NET?
http://classicvb.org/petition
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Window focus
- From: Sam Hobbs
- Re: Window focus
- From: Thorsten Albers
- Re: Window focus
- References:
- Window focus
- From: Lindsay
- Re: Window focus
- From: Sam Hobbs
- Re: Window focus
- From: Randy Birch
- Re: Window focus
- From: Sam Hobbs
- Re: Window focus
- From: Lindsay
- Window focus
- Prev by Date: Re: Passing string from VB to C++ dll routine
- Next by Date: Re: Window focus
- Previous by thread: Re: Window focus
- Next by thread: Re: Window focus
- Index(es):
Loading