Re: huge array
- From: "Alex Clark" <quanta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 22:44:39 -0500
"Larry Serflaten" <serflaten@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ORwz9z$LKHA.220@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
That's the short-sited view of the major problem. Anyone just starting
out
would certainly want to go with the latest and greatest, but what about
those
who have spent years building code assets?
I was one of those. I gradually migrated bits and pieces as customers
requested mods. A DLL here, an executable there, a bit of COM interop to
hold the classic & .NET code together. It wasn't hard.
Hard would've been burying my head in the sand and then being forced out of
VB6 due to lack of support. For a lot of these VB6 ostriches, it soon won't
even be their choice - MS are dropping support for the VB runtimes in the
next release of Windows and customer pressure will force their hand. In
that position I'm not sure what I would consider doing. .NET has grown
immensely since it was first released, and the learning curve now is far
greater than it was 7 years ago. C++ is quite a leap also, particularly for
VB6 coders who don't know what proper OOP is. What else is there? I
suppose RealBasic, Java, maybe Delphi? I'm sure it's a piece of cake to
migrate over to those...
Thats a bit like the digital TV signals put into effect earlier this year.
Those
just now buying a set would naturally go for the digital version. But
consider,
if all you had was a $100 portable TV, you wouldn't mind the change. But
if you
had built an entertainment center worth thousands of dollars, you wouldn't
be
so quick to throw out the old technology. In that case, the converter box
'hack' seems a likely alternative to replacing parts.
See above - the converter box is the .NET DLL which is exposing a COM
interface (the RCA cables). Already done it.
Warning or no, it still effects people in their pocket book, some more
than others.
It affects them far worse if they leave everything up until the point of
forced migration rather than recognising the signs and starting to migrate
in small chunks as early as possible. I for one found that after learning
enough about VB.NET, it became a 50/50 split as to which I preferred (.NET
or classic) and would usually try to force myself to design a .NET solution.
After a while I became more accustomed to VB.NET and even small mods to DLLs
(particuarly purely BI modules) quickly became .NET re-writes, because I
preferred the language and wanted other parts of the code to take advantage
of it.
Pocket books tend to get hurt the worst when people don't understand the
business they're in.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: huge array
- From: Karl E. Peterson
- Re: huge array
- From: mayayana
- Re: huge array
- References:
- huge array
- From: Wolf Wendel
- Re: huge array
- From: Bill McCarthy
- Re: huge array
- From: Wolf Wendel
- Re: huge array
- From: Tom Shelton
- Re: huge array
- From: Wolf Wendel
- Re: huge array
- From: mayayana
- Re: huge array
- From: Tom Shelton
- Re: huge array
- From: mayayana
- Re: huge array
- From: James Hahn
- Re: huge array
- From: mayayana
- Re: huge array
- From: Wolf Wendel
- Re: huge array
- From: Alex Clark
- Re: huge array
- From: Jim Mack
- Re: huge array
- From: Alex Clark
- Re: huge array
- From: Larry Serflaten
- huge array
- Prev by Date: Re: huge array
- Next by Date: Re: huge array
- Previous by thread: Re: huge array
- Next by thread: Re: huge array
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|