Re: Password Protection
- From: "Dave O." <nobody@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 15:31:51 +0100
"MikeD" <nobody@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:%2363$%23QRCJHA.3396@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Dave O." <nobody@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:%23wvUrMRCJHA.2056@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Firstly: rule one on password protection - Storing a password ANYWHERE
(as plain text) renders the security virtually non-existent, storing it
in the registry is a joke.
Not necessarily....as long as it's encrypted.
Er, which part of "(as plain text)" don't you understand?
You are broadly correct that any encryption would work, but as there is no
need to ever get the plain text password back from the crypt-text then why
bother to have the facility as it is just a potential security hole. Anyway
making a hash is no more complex than doing an encrypt and inherently more
secure.
<snip>
Now all of that I agree with 100%. I must admit, in my reply, I didn't
take into consideration simply deleting the password in the Registry.
Important tip, when designing security pretend to be a black hat and see how
it can be circumvented.
To reiterate what I said before, the level and complexity of security should
be proportional to the value of the software and the data it manipulates.
Regards
Dave O.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Password Protection
- From: MikeD
- Re: Password Protection
- References:
- Re: Password Protection
- From: MikeD
- Re: Password Protection
- Prev by Date: Re: Password Protection
- Next by Date: Re: Mouse & Subclass
- Previous by thread: Re: Password Protection
- Next by thread: Re: Password Protection
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|