Re: VB or?
- From: "Bill McCarthy" <Bill@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 12:09:26 +1000
"Karl E. Peterson" <karl@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:%23vtJsMBpIHA.672@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Earl Partridge wrote:I am at a complete
loss to understand what in my original post caused such a storm of
completely unrelated discussions.
Yeah, you didn't deserve any of it. I believe our government would tag you "collateral damage." IOW, you wandered into the middle of a firefight, and (rightfully) had no idea what was going on around you. There have been a bunch of trolls here lately, and they've set tempers and keyboards on edge. On behalf of the group, if I may be so pretentious, apologies...
--
Apologies are in deed in order. This however is not a one off incident, it is instead yet another example of the crap that's been going on in here. Again we see Mike Williams jump on a poster with the most ridiculous rhetoric, all part of his anti-dotnet nonsense. Was he scared that the best answer was indeed to use .NET... Apparently so.
And of course Karl, I shouldn't have to remind you of your recent attempts at encouraging flaming in here, especially those unsupported rants you waged against all dotnet developers. Cause and effect is plain to see just as soon as you learn to breathe.
.
- References:
- VB or?
- From: Earl Partridge
- Re: VB or?
- From: Howard Kaikow
- Re: VB or?
- From: Mike Williams
- Re: VB or?
- From: Earl Partridge
- Re: VB or?
- From: Karl E. Peterson
- VB or?
- Prev by Date: Re: objects yes, but which objects? (long rambling outloud pondering)
- Next by Date: Re: VB or?
- Previous by thread: Re: VB or?
- Next by thread: Re: VB or?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
