Re: reduce redundant code
- From: "MP" <NoSpam@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 09:30:26 -0500
Hi Steve,
"Steve Gerrard" <mynamehere@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:MNmdnYjLKp916EranZ2dnUVZ_remnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
MP wrote:
I'd sure like to get a handle on the oo way...don't know why I'm so
stupid that I cant' figure it out...other than I was born that way :-)
I can't pretend I have read this entire thread in detail, but I believe
you are dealing with an existing API that exposes certain objects, which
you can't change or add to.
precisely
My impression is that the "oo" way is something the developer
of that API should have done. For instance, if all those objects
implemented a common interface, you would be done already. So perhaps the
problem is that it is too late for "oo" in this case.
I just assume there's an oo way to encapsulate my interaction with that api
:-)
mark
.
- References:
- reduce redundant code
- From: MP
- Re: reduce redundant code
- From: Ralph
- Re: reduce redundant code
- From: MP
- Re: reduce redundant code
- From: Ralph
- Re: reduce redundant code
- From: MP
- Re: reduce redundant code
- From: Schmidt
- Re: reduce redundant code
- From: MP
- Re: reduce redundant code
- From: Steve Gerrard
- reduce redundant code
- Prev by Date: Re: VB 8 Standard and Professional
- Next by Date: Re: VB 8 Standard and Professional
- Previous by thread: Re: reduce redundant code
- Next by thread: Re: Font Names
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading