Re: Back to VB6 and .NET
- From: MM <kylix_is@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2008 09:24:01 +0000
On Mon, 4 Feb 2008 07:12:52 +0100, "Cor Ligthert[MVP]"
<notmyfirstname@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,
As I wrote in my first reaction in this thread.
VB is the #1 programming language for Microsoft.
VB 2008 has more new features then C# version 3
However I see that some in this newsgroup think that they are in a Linux
newsgroup. Telling bad things from another program language is easy, and the
less knowledge you have, the easier it is.
Didn't you tell bad things by lumping classic VB and VB.Net together,
saying simply, "VB is the #1 programming language for Microsoft"? In
reality, the new Net version is fundamentally different from classic
Visual Basic.
Classic VB *was* the #1 programming language, not just for Microsoft,
but for the whole world, but VB.Net is an also-ran, a pig-in-a-poke, a
chimera, a niche curiosity product that hardly anyone uses.
MM
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Back to VB6 and .NET
- From: Cor Ligthert [MVP]
- Re: Back to VB6 and .NET
- References:
- Re: Back to VB6 and .NET
- From: Harvey Triana
- Re: Back to VB6 and .NET
- From: Robert Conley
- Re: Back to VB6 and .NET
- From: Bob Butler
- Re: Back to VB6 and .NET
- From: Robert Conley
- Re: Back to VB6 and .NET
- Prev by Date: Re: Looking for some advice for my program
- Next by Date: Re: What Did I do?
- Previous by thread: Re: Back to VB6 and .NET
- Next by thread: Re: Back to VB6 and .NET
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading