Re: How's dot.net doing nowadays?
- From: dpb <none@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 09:46:38 -0600
Ralph wrote:
....
C gets its look because it was designed to be minimal. ...
I think if I remember K&R correctly (it's been a while since I actually read it the last time, thankfully :) ), their viewpoint was more that C was designed to be maximal, rather than minimal -- although as I write, I guess we're saying the same thing from the other viewpoint -- I think of it as dense in content, you're think sparse from the verbiage side...
Oh, yes, the days of the two- or three-pass paper-punch compilers. Now _there's_ something to be yearned for from the past! (NOT! :) ).
--
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: How's dot.net doing nowadays?
- From: Ralph
- Re: How's dot.net doing nowadays?
- From: MM
- Re: How's dot.net doing nowadays?
- References:
- Re: How's dot.net doing nowadays?
- From: Schmidt
- Re: How's dot.net doing nowadays?
- From: Robert Conley
- Re: How's dot.net doing nowadays?
- From: Schmidt
- Re: How's dot.net doing nowadays?
- From: Chris Anderson [MVP-VB]
- Re: How's dot.net doing nowadays?
- From: mayayana
- Re: How's dot.net doing nowadays?
- From: Chris Anderson [MVP-VB]
- Re: How's dot.net doing nowadays?
- From: MM
- Re: How's dot.net doing nowadays?
- From: Robert Conley
- Re: How's dot.net doing nowadays?
- From: dpb
- Re: How's dot.net doing nowadays?
- From: Robert Conley
- Re: How's dot.net doing nowadays?
- From: MM
- Re: How's dot.net doing nowadays?
- From: Ralph
- Re: How's dot.net doing nowadays?
- Prev by Date: Re: How's dot.net doing nowadays?
- Next by Date: Re: How's dot.net doing nowadays?
- Previous by thread: Re: How's dot.net doing nowadays?
- Next by thread: Re: How's dot.net doing nowadays?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|