Re: How's dot.net doing nowadays?

On Jan 21, 10:03 am, dpb <n...@xxxxxxx> wrote:


3) Use a product w/ a Standard and more than one vendor rather than a
single-vendor source product

Oh yes standards, and how do products look that are built on a
standard GUI?

Well like crap.

What libraries look good? They are all from specific vendors.

Standards language C++, Java? Sure if I want to code 10 times slower
and deal with damn semi-colons.




.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Hows dot.net doing nowadays?
    ... Standards language C++, Java? ... I had my VB6 version. ... In the process of converting the C to VB6 I ...
    (microsoft.public.vb.general.discussion)
  • Re: Modernizing Common Lisp
    ... library, is developers writing them. ... When there is momentum in the development space to produce these libraries, ... We now have several commercial implementations of CL. ... any of these plethora of standards, has problems porting in the Java world, ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)
  • Re: How Common Lisp sucks
    ... certainly a mechanism for creating defacto standards. ... libraries that work across implementations that provide de facto ... which also mean an increase in expressive power when added to Common Lisp.) ... language and making changes to the language. ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)
  • Re: Dont write your own X (was: Zed Shaw - Ruby has dodged a bullet)
    ... Maintaining third party libraries becomes exponentially easier when ... Adding in a lot of external libraries, no matter how well designed and ... tightly-focused small external libraries are usually the right answer. ... impedance mismatches, performance problems, lack of integration standards, ...
    (comp.lang.ruby)
  • Re: future C standards
    ... keeping C a vital and relevant language in the ... The thing about libraries is that they don't require the ... blessing of official standards to be useful. ...
    (comp.std.c)