Re: How's dot.net doing nowadays?
- From: Robert Conley <robertsconley@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 05:38:34 -0800 (PST)
On Jan 19, 11:03 pm, Robert Morley <rmor...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
in time when they appear to be unused." LOL
That said, though, I would agree with your basic premise. Then again, I
loved OOP almost from the moment I tried it. I just wish VB6 had done a bit
better of a job of it. Its stupid Implements command truly doesn't count
for anything in my books...it's invariably been more trouble than it's worth
in my experience.
Being able to implement an interface rather than inheriting behavior
is more important for Object Oriented programming. If you read through
Design Patterns and other books talking about the structure of object
oriented programming you will see more patterns needing to "implement
an interface" rather than "inherit a behavior".
With that being said, I rather have both but if I could only have one
then interface is the more useful.
.
- References:
- How's dot.net doing nowadays?
- From: MM
- Re: How's dot.net doing nowadays?
- From: David
- Re: How's dot.net doing nowadays?
- From: Chris Anderson [MVP-VB]
- Re: How's dot.net doing nowadays?
- From: Karl E. Peterson
- Re: How's dot.net doing nowadays?
- From: Chris Anderson [MVP-VB]
- Re: How's dot.net doing nowadays?
- From: Karl E. Peterson
- Re: How's dot.net doing nowadays?
- From: Chris Anderson [MVP-VB]
- Re: How's dot.net doing nowadays?
- From: MM
- Re: How's dot.net doing nowadays?
- From: Steve Gerrard
- Re: How's dot.net doing nowadays?
- From: Robert Morley
- How's dot.net doing nowadays?
- Prev by Date: Re: Abbrevation for TRUE
- Next by Date: Re: How's dot.net doing nowadays?
- Previous by thread: Re: How's dot.net doing nowadays?
- Next by thread: Re: How's dot.net doing nowadays?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading