Re: Delphi? Futureproof re vb!
- From: Tom Shelton <tom_shelton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 15:38:48 -0800
On 2007-12-12, MikeB <m.byerleyATVerizonDottieNettie> wrote:
"Tom Shelton" <tom_shelton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:%23IvZa8QPIHA.1188@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 2007-12-12, Suzy <not@valid> wrote:
Hi all
Might I just say, that going to Delphi, is probably not a wise choice.
First, your in your precieved situation because you tied yourself to a
vendor specific language - one that is not available from anyother
vendor. It seems to me that moving to Delphi is going to put you into
EXACTLY the same situation. No, if you want to avoid future "lock-in"
then you need to choose a language that either has a standard attached
to it or is availabe from multiple vendors. You can further enhance
this by choosing one that is available cross platform as well...
Maannnyy thousands using Free Pascal and Lazuras might take exception to
Delphi locking you to anything.
Excuse me... I thought Lazarus died a while ago. So - I guess you can
add it to the list :)
It's just a choice of an IDE where the language is Pascal and the Visual
Component Library furnishes the GUI components from Borland.
And you can't be serious when you recommend C++ as a RAD system.
Did I say C++ was a RAD system...
--
Tom Shelton
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Delphi? Futureproof re vb!
- From: MikeB
- Re: Delphi? Futureproof re vb!
- References:
- Delphi? Futureproof re vb!
- From: Suzy
- Re: Delphi? Futureproof re vb!
- From: Tom Shelton
- Re: Delphi? Futureproof re vb!
- From: MikeB
- Delphi? Futureproof re vb!
- Prev by Date: Re: Form is truncated.....
- Next by Date: Re: Is developing in VB6 still viable?
- Previous by thread: Re: Delphi? Futureproof re vb!
- Next by thread: Re: Delphi? Futureproof re vb!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|