Re: Why the VB6 versus VB.NET contest is baloney
- From: Tom Shelton <tom_shelton@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2007 09:56:02 -0800 (PST)
On Dec 3, 2:26 pm, "Michael C" <nos...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"dpb" <n...@xxxxxxx> wrote in messagenews:fj1qp9$ujh$1@xxxxxxxxxxx
The conclusion of this is that whatever development environment/language
you select, imo it should be a language that has a recognized Standard and
has compilers from more than one vendor. You then have a core language
with possible vendor-specific and/or OS-specific extensions, but you're
not tied into a single vendor with no real recourse.
Great idea but is that possible for a high level language?
Michael
C#, the CTS, and the core of the .NET framework are ISO standards.
There are currently 3 C# compilers - Microsoft's C# compiler, Novell's
Mono compiler, and the dotGNU compiler. The Mono project also has a
VB.NET compiler as well.
So, yes it's possible.
--
Tom Shelton
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: Why the VB6 versus VB.NET contest is baloney
- From: Robert Conley
- Re: Why the VB6 versus VB.NET contest is baloney
- From: Bert van den Dongen
- Re: Why the VB6 versus VB.NET contest is baloney
- From: dpb
- Re: Why the VB6 versus VB.NET contest is baloney
- From: Michael C
- Re: Why the VB6 versus VB.NET contest is baloney
- Prev by Date: Re: Why the VB6 versus VB.NET contest is baloney
- Next by Date: Re: Visual Basic 2008 express - Index property on label
- Previous by thread: Re: Why the VB6 versus VB.NET contest is baloney
- Next by thread: Re: Why the VB6 versus VB.NET contest is baloney
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|