Re: The inaugural VB6 vs dot net test
- From: "Michael C" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2007 16:43:49 +1100
"Mike Williams" <mikea@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:eQ7gIFgNIHA.5208@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thanks Bert. That is also the case on my laptop (Intel Celeron). Totally
different than on my main machine (AMD Athlon) on which the "count up" is
very much faster than the "count down". What processor does your HP use?
When comparing the count up vs down it might be best to end at a number
above zero. Otherwise we're testing 2 things at once - speed of for loop
counting to zero and speed of memory access counting backwards. If there's
any speed difference we can't know which to attribute it to.
Michael
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The inaugural VB6 vs dot net test
- From: Mike Williams
- Re: The inaugural VB6 vs dot net test
- References:
- Re: The inaugural VB6 vs dot net test
- From: Ulrich Korndoerfer
- Re: The inaugural VB6 vs dot net test
- From: Ulrich Korndoerfer
- Re: The inaugural VB6 vs dot net test
- From: Mike Williams
- Re: The inaugural VB6 vs dot net test
- From: Ulrich Korndoerfer
- Re: The inaugural VB6 vs dot net test
- From: Mike Williams
- Re: The inaugural VB6 vs dot net test
- From: Ulrich Korndoerfer
- Re: The inaugural VB6 vs dot net test
- From: Mike Williams
- Re: The inaugural VB6 vs dot net test
- From: Bert van den Dongen
- Re: The inaugural VB6 vs dot net test
- From: Mike Williams
- Re: The inaugural VB6 vs dot net test
- Prev by Date: Re: Looking for some logic help with dates and working outs.
- Next by Date: Re: Looking for some logic help with dates and working outs.
- Previous by thread: Re: The inaugural VB6 vs dot net test
- Next by thread: Re: The inaugural VB6 vs dot net test
- Index(es):
Loading