Re: Why the VB6 versus VB.NET contest is baloney
- From: David Kerber <ns_dkerber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 16:49:21 -0500
In article <uAJnULfNIHA.4688@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, nospam@xxxxxxxxxxx
says...
"dpb" <none@xxxxxxx> wrote in message news:fj1qp9$ujh$1@xxxxxxxxxxx
The conclusion of this is that whatever development environment/language
you select, imo it should be a language that has a recognized Standard and
has compilers from more than one vendor. You then have a core language
with possible vendor-specific and/or OS-specific extensions, but you're
not tied into a single vendor with no real recourse.
Great idea but is that possible for a high level language?
If you stick with ANSI standard C/C++, or (to a lesser extent) Java, it
is mostly doable.
--
Remove the ns_ from if replying by e-mail (but keep posts in the
newsgroups if possible).
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why the VB6 versus VB.NET contest is baloney
- From: Michael C
- Re: Why the VB6 versus VB.NET contest is baloney
- From: dpb
- Re: Why the VB6 versus VB.NET contest is baloney
- References:
- Re: Why the VB6 versus VB.NET contest is baloney
- From: Robert Conley
- Re: Why the VB6 versus VB.NET contest is baloney
- From: Bert van den Dongen
- Re: Why the VB6 versus VB.NET contest is baloney
- From: dpb
- Re: Why the VB6 versus VB.NET contest is baloney
- From: Michael C
- Re: Why the VB6 versus VB.NET contest is baloney
- Prev by Date: Re: The inaugural VB6 vs dot net test
- Next by Date: Re: Can this be done?
- Previous by thread: Re: Why the VB6 versus VB.NET contest is baloney
- Next by thread: Re: Why the VB6 versus VB.NET contest is baloney
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|